Minggu, 09 Oktober 2011

The Business of Blogging | The Sartorialist

The Business of Blogging | The Sartorialist

Scott Schuman | Photo: Garance Doré
Scott Schuman’s rise to international blogging fame is well known, but until now he has never discussed his business model in detail. In our latest instalment of The Business of Blogging, BoF gets the exclusive on how The Sartorialist makes bank
PARIS, France — With high-profile campaigns for Burberry and DKNY Jeans, a best-selling book, and a place on TIME magazine’s 2007 list of Top 100 Design Influencers, Scott Schuman is the streetstyle blogger that paved the way for hundreds of others who have followed in his trailblazing footsteps. For the fashion flock, being shot for The Sartorialist website is still the ultimate badge of honour.
But Mr. Schuman’s influence is felt far beyond the blogosphere. His beautifully framed photos, which feature fashion insiders and football fans alike, now appear on mood boards in design studios around the world. His photographic style has inspired countless advertising campaigns and editorials.
This week, as he celebrates his blog’s sixth anniversary, traffic numbers are spiking. The Sartorialist had around 13 million page views last month, a 44 percent increase over the same month last year, something Schuman attributes to a recent site redesign for which he manually re-tagged more than five years of posts himself, enabling visitors to more easily search his growing archive.
This could turn out to be a particularly savvy investment of time and money. If current traffic levels are sustained and significant portion of the advertising inventory on The Sartorialist is sold, it could theoretically make Scott Schuman fashion’s first million dollar a year blogger.
According to Mr. Schuman, The Sartorialist was originally inspired by Brooklyn-based writer Grace Bonney’s interior design blog Design*Sponge. “I could tell she was doing it by herself and I liked the idea that she was having an interaction,” he said. “She had like 30 comments on a post and I thought that was really cool.” Schuman decided to start a similar blog for fashion after examining a series of photos he had taken of a few stylish guys in New York’s Fulton fish market while on a photography course.
Since these beginnings, the fashion industry has witnessed an explosion of ‘front-row’ fashion bloggers, something that has not always pleased Schuman, at least not at first. Last week, a controversial interview with Schuman was published, showing Schuman’s apparent disdain for some of his much younger blogging peers. “I’ve kind of changed my mind [about that],” he told BoF, looking back with some contrition and pointing out that the interview in question is more than 18 months old. “With everybody, our relationships have really evolved. As I got to know Bryanboy and Tavi more, I’ve come to respect their seriousness of it. It’s a struggle to try and build [something] and still maintain who you are.”
But even if he is now more at ease with his blogging brethren, from the beginning Schuman understood the value of strategically associating himself with the mainstream fashion media, who took interest in his photographic style. “There were no important blogs at that time, so [I needed] to saddle up with someone to get that stamp of approval,” he explained. “The very first season, Style.com called me. They took a chance and said ‘Why don’t you [cover the shows] for us?’ They didn’t pay me very much money, but I give them credit for just taking that chance.”
“I knew exactly what I wanted to do. Style.com was the internet place to be; GQ was the men’s magazine to be [in],” he said. “The one thing that really helped was that I really took full advantage of every opportunity I was given. I worked my ass off, posting every night on my blog and Style.com. I remember the first time I went to Milan I had four meals in five days because I just didn’t stop. I had to get to the shows.”
But once The Sartorialist began to attract serious global attention, Schuman left these high-profile gigs behind to focus on building his own business. With his newfound independence, Schuman knew he would have to build out his own revenue streams. “You have to constantly spread out your streams, so if one stream starts to dry up you can go on,” he said. “The only stream coming in the beginning was working with GQ and Style.com.”
In 2008, James Danziger called. His eponymous gallery in New York hosted an exhibition for Schuman, selling his prints as “increasingly accomplished works of art in their own right,” according to the gallery’s website. The exhibit was an instant success, selling more than fifty prints at prices ranging from $1500 to $4000 each. But this proved not to be a stable source of income, said Schuman. “You don’t do an exhibit every year, so you’re constantly asking yourself how am I going to make that money next year?”
Mr. Schuman began thinking about his blog more deeply. “At the very beginning I had to decide: do I want this to be a blog about fashion, or do I want it to be an artistic photographic thing? I kept going back and forth. At some point I think I finally decided that I didn’t want to be a magazine. I decided to take a more photographic route.”
Schuman cites as inspiration the photography of documentary style cameramen like National Geographic’s Steve McCurry, the man behind the now-famous June 1985 cover photo featuring an Afghani girl with haunting sea green eyes. Looking at Schuman’s photos, you can sense that he is trying to capture the inner spirit of his subjects, not only their fashion sense. “I’m not reporting on a bag; who’s carrying what bag and who’s wearing what dress. I’m not reporting on people,” he explained. “What I am looking for is a certain grace.”
Schuman frowns upon the idea of putting a price on posts that appear in his content feed. “What I don’t like is advertorial posts that are under the table. When I did the Burberry thing – it’s Burberry, a humongous company with such control – and yet I shot that whole thing just like I would shoot everything,” he said, referring to his work for the British megabrand’s “Art of the Trench” social media campaign. We cast some of the people, we got people from the blog. Some people had their own Burberry coats, some people we gave them. I was very proud, so I shot 100 of them and I picked nine that I really loved [and said to my readers] ‘Here is the link to this Burberry project that I did.’”
Schuman has also worked on a product collaboration with American skin, hair, and body care brand Kiehl’s, creating a dopp kit with a variety of Kiehl’s products in exchange for a fixed fee. “We had Luca Roda manufacture it in Italy. As I was a stay-at-home Dad, I really wanted to push this Father’s Day thing. So, we went to the park where I took my kids, where I learnt photography, [and] we got 10 dads to run around with their kids and said ‘We want to take pictures of you having fun with your kids,’ and those were the photographs that we got. So, I wrote something very heartfelt [on my blog] about what it was like to be a stay-at-home Dad.”
At first, Schuman hesitates when asked whether he was contractually obligated to write about the Kiehl’s collaboration on his blog, but then offers: “I’m the one that pitched it in. I’m the one who said I wanted it to be about Father’s Day. It was because of me. I wanted to do this photo thing. So it was part of the contract because I wanted to do it. It was a fun process.”
Of course, like other photo bloggers, Schuman also sells his images to magazines, through his agent, Jedroot. But by far his biggest (and most stable) source of revenue now comes from ad sales on The Sartorialist website. Initially, Schuman worked with Style.com to sell his advertising inventory, but has taken this function back in-house, explaining that he is in a much better position to sell the ads himself because he understands the website better than anyone else could.
“I’ve been doing the ads for me and Garance for the last year,” he said, referring to his girlfriend Garance Doré, another superstar blogger, known for her illustrations, writing and photography. “Just like it took me forever to learn photography, it took me forever to learn how to sell [ads] like real agencies” on a CPM (cost per thousand impressions) basis, instead of the monthly sponsorship or affiliate commission models used by many other independent fashion blogs.
“American Apparel and Net-a-Porter came from Style.com and they were just buying a month [of ads] for a flat amount of money. But I didn’t think that was right and I knew that’s not how we were going to grow. We were going to have to talk the talk like everybody else. We couldn’t just say ‘Oh, we’re just a little blog.’ If we’re going to make a business here, we’ve got to talk their language.”
And talk their language he does. Schuman rattles off digital media lingo with ease, speaking fluently about ‘geo-targeting’ and digital ad unit dimensions. He declined to reveal his exact CPM rate, but said that it has been increasing steadily over time, going above the thirty dollar range for the most valuable inventory. “People would tell me all these crazy numbers and say ‘It’s premium, it should be way up here,’” he said, motioning to the ceiling. “But like anything, you start out at a price where people are willing to buy. It doesn’t help to have a $40 CPM if nobody’s buying it,” he said.
But at his current traffic levels, even with a $20 CPM and only 50 percent of total inventory sold, Schuman could theoretically earn over $100,000 per month on advertising alone, easily earning him more than a million dollars of revenue per year from advertisers that now include blue chip luxury brands like Tiffany, Coach, and Ferragamo. Removing some nominal overheads and salaries, this makes for a very profitable niche media business.
And then of course, there’s his best-selling book, The Sartorialist, published by Penguin in September 2009, which has sold over 100,000 copies. “It did good,” said Schuman with a smile, expressing his surprise at the success of the book, for which he earned a six-figure advance against royalties. He received two royalty cheques on top of the advance within the first year of publishing. “I was shocked I even got one,” he says.
It shouldn’t come as a surprise however that Schuman has another book up his sleeve. “Now the process is much easier, because I know how to approach it. And Penguin is very excited.” With the current book still selling briskly, Penguin is waiting for the right time to publish Schuman’s next book, which could be published as early as 2012.
“You can really make a living out of this,” said Schuman emphatically. “It’s tough, but if you work really hard you can create a business, if you’re smart about it and have something real to say.”
Imran Amed is founder and editor of The Business of Fashion
Add star
ShareShare with note

AN EXCERPT OF MATT MILLEN AND SEAN MCDONOUGH CALLING MSU/OSU

AN EXCERPT OF MATT MILLEN AND SEAN MCDONOUGH CALLING MSU/OSU

Sean McDonough and Matt Millen called the Michigan State/Ohio State game this past weekend. They did NOT have a real good time, and it sounded a lot like this.
127831190_extra_large_medium

Sean McDonough: That was a horrible throw.
Matt McDonough: That was a fucking horrible throw, Sean. I would apologize to the crowd at home, but they get what they deserve for continuing to watch this.
Sean: Right on, Matt. Can't blame a dog for licking an electric fence.
Matt: Let that pooch fry, I say.
Sean. Indeed. 3rd and 12 for Ohio State.
[Ohio State drops a floppily thrown pass on 3rd down.]


Matt: Great catch if by catch you mean not catching the football.

Sean. That throw is telling a child their grandmother is in hell for being a whore at her funeral while making the dick-in-hole gesture with your fingers.


Matt: And nodding suggestively, too. Braxton Miller runs like a handicapped person who stole something but is also handicapped.

Sean: No argument here, though the handicapped may be offended at being compared to something that slow. Matt: Seems like ol Jim Bollman got into the grain alcohol a few quarters early today, Sean.
Sean: Yessir, a 15 yard in-route run backwards seems counter-productive.
Matt: In the film room, they explained this play to us by saying that they wanted to get the ball to their guy in space, but also cut out the middle man by losing all yardage on first down to conserve energy.
Sean: Mission accomplished. Here's the punt.
[Due to time constraints, we fast forward in the action to the fourth quarter.]
Matt: Kirk Cousins is a very good quarterback but cognitively he is a Sun Bear with a learning disability.
Sean: The Ohio State defense has been confusing him with squeaky toys and honey-scented jerseys, according to our sideline reporter Jeannine Edwards. Let's go down to her on the field.
Jeannine Edwards: [WEEPING UNCONTROLLABLY]
Matt: She's a pro.
Sean: THE BEST.
Matt: Dantonio can't coach, but he hates humanity with a burning passion and that's what makes him the moderately successful and extremely lonely person he is.
Sean: It's lonely at the top, Matt.
Matt: And lonelier still in an empty basement where you stare at your only friend, a burned Christmas tree you call Harald the Inconsolable.
Sean: I have a new respect for the punt today, Matt. It's the mercy flush of offensive plays in this game.
Matt: I'm sorry Sean, I didn't hear you. I was trying to swallow my own tongue.
Sean: Our words have no meaning, Matt. Punt coming up, not that it matters in the howling cold void of this world.

[On the ensuing Ohio State possession.]
Sean: Oh mute and non-existent God please.
Matt: Seems like ol Jim Bollman got into the grain alcohol a few quarters early today, Sean. Braxton Miller just takes the ball here and begins rolling around on the ground like he's on fire.
Sean: Could be marking it with his scent after Bauserman came in on that series.
Matt: Could be, Sean. It's important for a qb to let everyone know he's in charge.
Sean: No doubt, sir. I hate this game like I hated my father.
[run goes for 1.5 yards]
127831192_extra_large_medium
Matt: Sean, I would rather put my dick into a running weed-eater than watch this o-line block another down.
Sean: Michigan State's defensive line was starved all week and lashed with a whip with rusted nails at the end. And it shows.
Matt: Sean, I am going to watch Whitney for the 45 seconds it will take us to watch and describe this play. It will be less painful.

Sean: [snorts line of PCP] And Bauserman returns for 3rd and a parsec. The answer to our AFLAC trivia question: Joe Bauserman's favorite sports drink? It is arthritis.
Matt: Sean, when I was twelve I accidentally fed my golden retriever a bag of sewing needles. I watched that dog die. It was the worst of experience of my life until I watched this game.
Sean: Matt, that was no accident and we both know it.
Matt: So true, Sean. But neither is this game.
Sean: I'm not sure if I'm having a stroke or if half of my body has taken the easy way out.
Matt: Ask Jim Bollman. He's having one right now. But it's fine if you are. Even if half your body quits it is still putting out twice as much effort as either of these offenses.
[Ohio State punts]
Matt: I talked to some scouts, and what they tell me is that Kirk Cousins is a marionette made of shit brittle.

[With a late lead, Michigan State opts to pass. The Spartan defense stop the interception return before it can do too much damage.]
Matt: Sean, Colorectal cancer.
Sean: [crying] What?
Matt: This game makes me want it.
Add star
ShareShare with note

World's first food fat tax imposed in Denmark

World's first food fat tax imposed in Denmark

An attempt to limit the intake of fatty foods, it will be levied on all products that include saturated fats.
Add star
ShareShare with noteKeep unreadNot interested

Portal 2′s Free DLC Arrives October 4th

Portal 2′s Free DLC Arrives October 4th


Valve send word that their free DLC for Portal 2 will arrive on October 4th. Man, I totally already said all that in the headline! Here’s what I didn’t say, which was what Valve said: “In “Peer Review”, you and a friend will continue the story of loyal bots P-Body and Atlas as you puzzle your way through a mysterious new co-op test track and once again match wits with GLaDOS. The DLC also features a single player and co-op Challenge Mode, and leaderboards to compare Challenge Mode scores with friends and the Portal community.”
In other Portal news there’s more Songs TO Test by over here, and I’ve posted quite a special Portal fan video below. Thanks, Jeep!
(more…)

The Oracle NoSQL Database 11G

The Oracle NoSQL Database 11G

A bit after posting my predictions about the Oracle NoSQL database, I’ve received a link to a PDF introducing the Oracle NoSQL database, embedded below for your reference.
Summarized:
  • based on BerkleyDB Java Edition. Thus it is a key-value store
  • it’s a commercial product available as a Community edition and an Enterprise edition
  • single-master with multireplicas.
  • PAXOS-based automated fail-over master election
  • supports configurable consistency policies
  • auto-sharding
  • update: there’s no download available yet, the term mentioned being mid-October
Update: There’s an official product page: Oracle NoSQL Database Technical Overview.

Oracle NoSQL database key features:

  • Simple Data Model
  • Key-value pair data structure, keys are composed of Major & Minor keys
  • Easy-to-use Java API with simple Put, Delete and Get operations
  • Scalability
  • Automatic, hash-function based data partitioning and distribution
  • Intelligent NoSQL Database driver is topology and latency aware, providing optimal data access
  • Predictable behavior
  • ACID transactions, configurable globally and per operation
  • Bounded latency via B-tree caching and efficient query dispatching
  • High Availability
  • No single point of failure
  • Built-in, configurable replication
  • Resilient to single and multi-storage node failure
  • Disaster recovery via data center replication
  • Easy Administration
  • Web console or command line interface
  • System and node management
  • Shows system topology, status, current load, trailing and average latency, events and alerts
Popout
I was only half right about this one.
Original title and link: The Oracle NoSQL Database 11G (NoSQL database©myNoSQL)

HERE'S WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE ECONOMY... (And How To Fix It)

HERE'S WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE ECONOMY... (And How To Fix It)


great depression
The United States is in a very tough spot, economically and politically.
The 25-year debt-fueled boom of 1982-2007 has ended, and it has left the country with a stagnant economy, massive debts, high unemployment, huge wealth inequality, an enormous budget deficit, and a sense of entitlement engendered by a half-century of prosperity.
After decades of instant gratification, Americans have also come to believe that all problems can be solved instantly, if only the right leaders are put in charge and the right decisions are made. And so our government has devolved into a permanent election campaign, in which incumbents blame each other for the current mess, and challengers promise change.
The trouble is that our current problems cannot be solved with a simple fix. They also cannot be solved quickly. It took 25 years for us to get to this point, and it will likely take us at least a decade or two to work our way out of it, even if we make the right decisions.
So it is time that we began to face reality.
THE PROBLEM: TOO MUCH DEBT
Debt As A Percent Of GDPFour years ago, when the debt-fueled boom ended and the economy plunged into recession, most economists and politicians misdiagnosed the problem.
They thought we were having just another post-War recession—a serious recession, yes, but a cyclical one, a recession that easy money, government stimulus, and a return of "confidence" could fix.
A handful of economists, meanwhile, argued that the recession was actually fundamentally different—a "balance sheet" recession resulting from a quarter-century-long debt-binge, one that would take a decade or more to fix.
In the past four years, it has become increasingly clear that the latter diagnosis was correct: The US economy is behaving exactly the way other economies have behaved after piling up mountains of debt and eventually going through a financial crisis. It is bumping along with disappointing growth, high unemployment, and, increasingly (and understandably) social unrest.
Total US DebtSo how do you get out of a "balance sheet" recession triggered by too much debt?
You reduce the debt.
More specifically—and here's the critical point—you reduce the debt that is crippling the productive part of the economy. This is the part that creates most of the jobs, prosperity, and wealth. It is also the part that pays for the rest of the economy. That part is the private sector.
What debt is crippling the private sector?
Consumer debt. The household mortgages, credit cards, student loans, and other obligations that is forcing consumers to save and pay down debts instead of spend. Consumers still account for about 70% of the spending in the US economy, and that spending is now constrained. (See chart below—click for larger).
(Consumer spending was also artificially boosted for 25 years by the debt binge, so there's no way we're going back to that era. And we shouldn't strive to).
Household Debt As A Percent Of GDPHow can consumers reduce their debts?
By doing what they are doing right now:
  • Spending less
  • Saving more
  • Paying down debt
  • Restructuring debt
  • Defaulting
Importantly, this process takes time. And unless you're willing to just tear up the laws and contracts that have formed the basis of the country's economy for the past two centuries, there's no way to just wave a magic wand and make the debts go away.
Also importantly, this healing process has nothing to do with "restoring confidence." Or "reducing regulation." Even if you could suddenly cast a spell and make all Americans (irrationally) exuberant again, you can't solve a debt problem with more debt. Specifically, you can't reduce the amount you owe by borrowing more.
So where does that leave the economy?
It leaves the private sector, the productive engine of the economy, nursing its way back to health.
And it leaves the public sector—the government—trying to minimize the pain while the private sector heals itself.
Public Debt As A Percent Of GDPComplicating the US's problem, of course, is that the public sector—the government—has also racked up humongous debts in the past quarter century. For now, those debts are still manageable: Our creditors are still willing to lend us as much as we want, on ever-easier terms. But, eventually, these debts will have to be addressed. Specifically, at some point, the government will have to cut back spending and reduce its debts, at least as a percentage of GDP. Or the entire government will go bust.
Those facts should be relatively uncontroversial. Where the disagreement comes is when and where the government should cut back—and how much.
One side argues that the government should cut back immediately and completely, forcing the country to "take its medicine" in one quick dose.
The other side argues that the government should continue spending to support the economy until the private sector is healthy enough to once again carry the torch.
The policies that arise from this argument affect the lives and livelihoods of hundreds of millions of people, so it's not surprising that people feel strongly about them.
THE SOLUTIONS
So what's the best approach to solving our problem?
Here's where philosophical differences come into play. "Best" is, at least somewhat, in the eye of the beholder.
The two extreme solutions are these:
Job Losses By RecessionDo you want a violent, painful "adjustment" in which many million more Americans are thrown out of work and the incomes and spending of tens of millions of Americans are suddenly reduced, thus crushing American companies at the same time?
Then immediately cut government spending from ~20%+ of GDP to the 15% of GDP the government collected in taxes last year and hope (pray) that the resulting dislocation doesn't further wallop GDP (which history suggests it almost certainly will).
Do you want to pretend we don't have serious problems and just keep the government spending vastly more than it takes in every year until our government debt load finally becomes unmanageable and the currency collapses?
Then just keep doing what we've been doing for most of the past 30 years.
For obvious reasons, neither of those two approaches are appealing.
Fortunately, there's a third option, which lies somewhere in the middle.
This solution consists of two parts:
  1. Acknowledging the problem (and the problems with either extreme approach)
  2. Designing an approach that addresses these problems and helps us work our way out of our predicament with the least possible pain, dislocation, and disruption.
THE "ACKNOWLEDGEMENT" PHASE...
  • Acknowledge the real problem with the economy—that we're in a "balance sheet" recession
  • Acknowledge that, to fix the economy, consumers need to work off their debts
  • Acknowledge that trend-line government spending is already too high relative to both GDP and the taxes that the government collects
  • Acknowledge that, eventually, to fix the latter problem, government spending will have to drop and taxes will have to go up
  • Acknowledge that, raising taxes and/or cutting spending sharply right now will wallop the economy
  • Acknowledge that walloping the economy right now will make the problem worse, not better, at least over the short term (consumers will have less money to spend, so the economy will shrink, and tax collection will drop...and then this vicious cycle will repeat. See Greece.)
  • Acknowledge that making the problem worse right now will increase social frustration and unrest (See Occupy Wall Street).  It also won't help the rich get richer.
  • Acknowledge that denying the problem and continuing runaway government spending indefinitely will eventually lead to a debt and currency crisis (see Argentina)
  • Acknowledge that, right now, the government can borrow as much money as it wants at historically low interest rates—rates that are getting lower all the time
  • Acknowledge that the only spending in the economy that the government can directly control is government spending
  • Acknowledge, therefore, that the "best approach" given our current reality involves two specific goals:
    • Minimizing short-term pain while giving consumers time to nurse themselves back to health
    • Getting the long-term deficit under control before the government implodes
THIS LEADS TO A SOLUTION THAT SEEMS THE MOST REASONABLE AND LEAST RISKY AND DISRUPTIVE GIVEN THE CURRENT REALITY...
  • The government should construct and pass a long-term budget plan that
    • Minimizes short-term pain, while
    • Getting the long-term deficit under control
  • This budget plan should be designed to benefit all Americans, not just special-interest groups or different classes or industries
  • This budget plan can theoretically include an increase in short-term spending designed to minimize the country's pain, as long as it also includes a decrease in long-term spending (again, right now, the world is willing to lend us as much money as we want)
  • One form of government spending that unequivocally benefits all Americans is infrastructure spending (when the projects are finished, America has the infrastructure)
  • Infrastructure spending would help America address another reality that has emerged in the past three decades—the reality that the infrastructure of many countries in Europe, Asia, and other regions has vaulted past that in the US and made the US look like a second-world country
  • Infrastructure spending would boost employment in one sector of the economy hammered by the recession—construction
  • Infrastructure spending would involve fewer of the conflicts and misaligned incentives that infuriate many Americans about "entitlement programs," extended unemployment benefits, welfare, food stamps, and other government expenditures that seem to encourage sloth and laziness and "socialism"
  • The 10-year government budget designed to get us out of our current predicament, therefore, should probably include a massive, multi-year infrastructure spending program.
Homeless Tent CityThere, I said it. I have now revealed that I find merit in an approach advocated by one side in the religious war (Keynesians). And this religious war is so emotional that I will immediately be flamed as an enemy of the state, despite also advocating the reduced-spending approach held by the other side (Austerians).
But so be it.
I think this is the most reasonable approach to solving our nation's problems. I'll explain more about why in the coming days.
SEE ALSO: Here's Why This Recession Is Fundamentally Different
Please follow Business Insider on Twitter and Facebook.
Join the conversation about this story »
See Also:



Add star
ShareShare with noteKeep unread

Iran: shevey spring waterfall from 360Cities

Iran: shevey spring waterfall

360° panorama by meysam akbarzadeh.
Click the image to open the interactive version.

آبشار شِوی یکی از بزرگ‌ترین و زیباترین آبشارهای ایران در رشته‌کوه‌های زاگرس است. شوی در گویش لری بختیاری نامی زنانه به معنی لطافت است. آبشار شوی یا تله زنگ در سردشت از توابع دزفول واقع در استان خوزستان، و با فاصلهٔ اندکی از استان لرستان و در بین کوههای سرتنگ شوی در ۱۰ کیلومتری ایستگاه راه آهن تله زنگ و در مسیر راه آهن سراسری تهران - جنوب واقع شده‌است. این عکس در ابتدای مهرماه گرفته شده است و با توجه به اینکه مهرماه کم آب ترین فصل سال می باشد یکی از چشمه های شوی خشک شده و تقریبا نیمی از آبشار خشک می باشد

Short skirts will get you raped. Also shorts. Also just leaving your house, so stop doing that. I’m just trying to help. from Feministe by Jill

Short skirts will get you raped. Also shorts. Also just leaving your house, so stop doing that. I’m just trying to help.

Three photos of men in shorts Look at these sluts, just asking for it.
Your skirt shorts are going to get you raped. That’s the message NYPD officers are sending to women in Park Slope, Brooklyn:
Earlier this evening, at around 7:30 p.m., I was on my way home from the gym, keys in hand, not talking on my cell phone, very aware of my surroundings. I passed a cop and he asked if I would stop and talk to him. He then asked two women who were wearing dresses to stop and talk to him. Here is our conversation:
Cop: “Do you know what’s been going on in this neighborhood?”
Me: “Yes, a man has attacked several women.”
Cop: “Do you know what he’s looking for?”
Lady: “…Young women walking alone?”
Cop: “And how do you know that? Someone told you that?”
Lady: “No, I’ve been reading about this in the news.”
Cop: (points to my gym clothes) “Your shorts are pretty short.” (points at women’s dresses) “Kind of showing some skin. Do you think that might make this guy angry, think he can get easy access?”
Me: “I really appreciate that cops are out in the neighborhood, but I’m coming home from the gym, and it’s hot outside. Women should be able to wear shorts and dresses without it being seen as an excuse to be attacked.”
Cop: “I’m just making sure you’re aware of what’s going on. Girls like you are targets.”
Me: “Thank you for being out here, but I would really prefer if you caught the criminal.”
But maybe it’s just one officer, right? Nope!
Asked whether officers were warning women against wearing shorts or skirts, the New York City Police Department responded in no time.
“Officers are not telling women what not to wear—there’s a TV series that does that,” quipped Deputy Commissioner Paul Browne in an email. “They are simply pointing out that as part of the pattern involving one or more men that the assailant(s) have targeted women wearing skirts.”
The rapist is targeting women who are wearing skirts, so NYPD officers are warning women who are wearing… shorts. Sure. Also the rapist is targeting people who appear to have vaginas, so maybe people who appear to have vaginas should just leave their bodies at home. What’s wrong with that advice? I’m just looking out for you.
I don’t live in Park Slope, but I’m in an adjacent neighborhood, and for a while there were a string of muggings nearby. The mugger targeted men — most of whom were wearing pants with pockets, in which they kept their wallets and cell phones for easy access. And yet I didn’t hear of one police officer stopping a bepantsed man and “simply pointing out that as part of the pattern.” Weird. I’m sure that was just a departmental oversight.
Add star
ShareShare with note

Mexico's 'Cannabis Libraries' reflect rising drug problem, and changing attitudes

Mexico's 'Cannabis Libraries' reflect rising drug problem, and changing attitudes

Mexico's Cannabis Libraries, public collections of reliable information about illegal drugs, help to educate citizens in a country that is seeing consumption on the rise.

Add star
ShareShare with noteKeep unread